Deal Reached on DoD Authorization Bill

  • December 13th, 2011

By Jeremy Herb - 12/12/11 08:49 PM ET, THE HILL

Lawmakers reached an agreement Monday on the $662 billion Defense authorization bill they believe will satisfy White House demands to avoid a veto over the detention of terror suspects.

House and Senate Armed Services Committee leaders changed the bill to add a provision saying that FBI and other law enforcement’s national security authority would not be affected by provisions mandating military custody of terror suspects.

A White House veto threat has been hanging over the Pentagon policy bill for the past month, but House and Senate Armed Services Committee leaders said Monday the new language would address the Obama administration’s biggest concerns with the mandatory military detention of terror suspects.

The clause is similar to the one added to the Senate bill that addressed concerns among Senate Democrats about U.S. citizens being detained indefinitely without changing the bill’s core language.

“I can’t imagine that the president would veto would veto this bill,” said Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), who has said that the bill would not have hampered law enforcement like the administration claimed. “I very strongly believe this should satisfy the administration, and hope it will.”

The legislation also changed the waiver provision, which allows the executive branch to move suspects from military to civilian custody, so that the president can issue a waiver, rather than the defense secretary. Levin said this was done at the request of President Obama, who spoke with Levin last week about the bill.

Senate Armed Services Ranking Member Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said he hoped “the administration will not be swayed by political considerations or election year considerations coming up.”

The White House did not immediately comment after the conference committee finalized the bill Monday evening.

After the conference report was completed Monday, Levin said he did not know whether the votes were there to override a veto. He said he had not received assurances from the White House it would not veto the final bill.

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon (R-Calif.) said the bill will be sent to the Rules Committee Monday evening, and would likely receive a House vote Wednesday. The Senate expects to vote on the bill sometime later this week.

The Defense authorization bill, which sets policy and spending priorities for the Pentagon, is generally considered must-pass legislation, and it has passed for 50 years straight.

The conference committee also tweaked Iran central bank sanctions at the administration’s request, though the bulk of the amendment from Sens. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) and Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) remained in the final bill.

The bill still restricts the transfer of Guantanamo detainees for one year, another provision the administration had objected to.

The legislation also froze $700 million in aid to Pakistan until more help is offered from the country stopping IEDs from being produced.

Both the House and Senate bills had provisions elevating the National Guard Chief to become a permanent member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but the Pentagon and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs opposed the measure. Some thought the measure would get stripped from the final conference report.

After the final deal was announced, McCain, who has not been supportive of elevating the Guard chief, only needed two words to say what happened.

“They won,” McCain said.

Share

President Obama On Pearl Harbor Day, December 7, 2011

  • December 7th, 2011

Here is President Obama’s statement on the 70th anniversary of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor:

pearl harbor.jpgSeventy years ago today, a bright Sunday morning was darkened by the unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbor.  Today, Michelle and I join the American people in honoring the memory of the more than 2,400 American patriots—military and civilian, men, women and children—who gave their lives in our first battle of the Second World War.  Our thoughts and prayers are with the families for whom this day is deeply personal—the spouses, brothers and sisters, and sons and daughters who have known seven decades without a loved one but who have kept their legacy alive for future generations.

We salute the veterans and survivors of Pearl Harbor who inspire us still.

Despite overwhelming odds, they fought back heroically, inspiring our nation and putting us on the path to victory.  They are members of that Greatest Generation who overcame the Depression, crossed oceans and stormed the beaches to defeat fascism, and turned adversaries into our closest allies.  When the guns fell silent, they came home, went to school on the G.I. Bill, and built the largest middle class in history and the strongest economy in the world.  They remind us that no challenge is too great when Americans stand as one.  All of us owe these men and women a profound debt of gratitude for the freedoms and standard of living we enjoy today…

On this National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day, we also reaffirm our commitment to carrying on their work—to keeping the country we love strong, free and prosperous.  And as today’s wars in Iraq and Afghanistan come to an end and we welcome home our 9/11 Generation, we resolve to always take care of our troops, veterans and military families as well as they’ve taken care of us.  On this solemn anniversary, there can be no higher tribute to the Americans who served and sacrificed seventy years ago today.

 

Share
  • Posted in: News
  • Tags:

Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing on National Guard Empowerment

  • November 9th, 2011

Its crunch time National Guard community! If you’ve never sent your Senator an email for his or her support, the time to do it is now!

The Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) has scheduled a full committee hearing at 10:00 am on November 10th
(Thursday) to discuss the proposal to create a permanent seat on the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JSC) for the Chief of the National Guard Bureau (CNGB). Witnesses include the sitting members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who unanimously oppose this initiative, and the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.

The House of Representatives already passed this legislation and, to date, 68 Senators have supported elevating the CNGB to the JCS, including the majority of the Senate Armed Services Committee; and the initiative has received endorsements by the National Governor’s Association, Veterans of Foreign Wars, the American Legion, Adjutant Generals Association of the United States, and the President of the United States as a campaign promise in his Blueprint for Change in 2008.

However, SASC leadership and current members of the Joint Chiefs have outspokenly opposed elevating the CNGB to the JCS, and have called this hearing to speak out against passing S. 1025 in the Senate.

Contact your Senate co-sponsors and members of the SASC (see list of current SASC co-sponsors below) to ensure their continued support of this historic legislation (sample letter available). If a Senator is not a co-sponsor, please contact them and urge their support. Webcast of the hearing available here: http://armed-services.senate.gov/Webcasts.htm.
It may also be available on C-SPAN.

MG (Ret) Gus Hargett Jr, President of the National Guard Associatio of the United States, said in an interview this morning that “The Army is its own brand, the Air Force is its own brand. But, you know, the Guard is the only component out there that’s really two brands. They’re the citizen-soldier in peace time and and they’re the guys called to active federal service in war time.” To read the full interview, click here.

SASC DEMOCRATIC CO-SPONSORS
Daniel K. Akaka (Hawaii)
Ben Nelson (Nebraska)
Claire McCaskill (Missouri)
Mark Udall (Colorado)
Kay R. Hagan (North Carolina)
Mark Begich (Alaska)
Joe Manchin III (West Virginia)
Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire)
Kirsten E. Gillibrand (New York)
Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut)

SASC REPUBLICAN CO-SPONSORS
Scott P. Brown (Massachusetts)
Kelly Ayotte (New Hampshire)
Lindsey Graham (South Carolina)
David Vitter (Louisiana)

SASC DEMOCRATS (NOT SIGNED ON)
Joseph I. Lieberman (Connecticut)
Jack Reed (Rhode Island)
Carl Levin (Michigan)

SASC REPUBLICANS (NOT SIGNED ON)
John McCain (Arizona)
James M. Inhofe (Oklahoma)
Jeff Sessions (Alabama)
Saxby Chambliss (Georgia)
Roger F. Wicker (Mississippi)
Rob Portman (Ohio)
Susan M. Collins (Maine)
John Cornyn (Texas)

Share

Two-Thirds in Senate Now Support National Guard Empowerment!

  • November 3rd, 2011

WASHINGTON (Nov. 3, 2011) ― Sixty-eight senators have now declared their support for legislation that would give the National Guard a permanent, unfiltered voice at the Pentagon.

The latest effort in the Senate to further empower the nation’s citizen-soldiers began in May when Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., introduced the National Guard Empowerment and State-National Defense Integration Act of 2011 (S. 1025). Sixty-four senators (list below) have since signed on as co-sponsors.

Among the bill’s provisions is language to give the Guard’s senior officer, the chief of the National Guard Bureau, a seat on the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Two more senators ― Sen. Daniel K. Inouye, D-Hawaii, and Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb.― have said they will join their 66 colleagues in supporting a Guard “seat at the table” when provisions of S. 1025 are added as amendments to the fiscal 2012 defense authorization bill later this year.

The House approved similar language in May, meaning it now only needs Senate approval to be sent to President Barack Obama, who promised to add the Guard to the Joint Chiefs in his 2008 campaign booklet, The Blueprint for Change: Barack Obama’s Plan for America.

“Our elected officials in Washington are sending a clear message,” said retired Maj. Gen. Gus L. Hargett Jr., the president of the National Guard Association of the United States. “But this is so much more than about giving the Guard a voice in final resource decisions. It’s about the nation’s defense and security.

“The primary role of the Joint Chiefs is to advise the president, the secretary of defense and the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security,” he said. “Without the Guard as a statutory participant at the table, our civilian leaders won’t always have unfiltered information on Guard capabilities and cost-effectiveness. Nor will they have direct access to the Guard’s domestic-response expertise. Twenty years ago, this was nice-to-know information. Today, it’s critical.”

The NGB chief currently participates as an invited guest in some discussions with the Joint Chiefs. However, he is not a mandatory participant and is often excluded from meetings. Nor does he have the ability to nominate Guard officers for positions that require Senate confirmation.

S. 1025 would enable the NGB chief to sit with the heads of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines ― none of whom have ever served in the Guard ― and provide the Guard, for the first time, permanent representation among the nation’s senior military officers.

In addition to overall numbers, adding the Guard to the Joint Chiefs enjoys wide bi-partisan and geographic support in the Senate. Forty-four Democrats, 23 Republicans and one Independent support the effort. And 42 states have at least one senator formally backing it.

Plus, the nation’s governors and several other associations, including the Veterans of Foreign War, have endorsed a Guard seat at the table.

National Guard Empowerment and State-National Defense Integration Act of 2011

Introduced by Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.

Co-sponsors and the date they formally signed on:

Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii (July 11, 2011)
Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn. (June 7, 2011)
Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H. (July 12, 2011)
Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. (June 15, 2011)
Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska (May 23, 2011)
Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo. (Sept. 6, 2011)
Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M. (June 8, 2011)
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. (June 27, 2011)
Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo. (July 26, 2011)
Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark. (June 16, 2011)
Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif. (Aug. 2, 2011)
Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass. (June 23, 2011)
Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio (June 23, 2011)
Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C. (Sept. 6, 2011)
Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash. (Sept. 6, 2011)
Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md. (Sept. 6, 2011)
Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del. (Sept. 6, 2011)
Sen. Bob Casey, D- Pa. (July 7, 2011)
Sen. Daniel Coats, R-Ind. (June 15, 2011)
Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D. (Sept. 21, 2011)
Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del. (May 26, 2011)
Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn. (May 23, 2011)
Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho (Oct. 6, 2011)
Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill. (Sept. 13, 2011)
Sen. Michael Enzi, R- Wyo. (Sept. 15, 2011)
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. (July 7, 2011)
Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn. (July 21, 2011)
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y. (May 26, 2011)
Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa (June 13, 2011)
Sen. Kay R. Hagan, D-N.C. (July 22, 2011)
Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa (July 5, 2011)
Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev. (Sept. 21, 2011)
Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D. (July 27, 2011)
Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb. (Oct. 11, 2011)
Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis. (Oct. 6, 2011)
Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D. (May 26, 2011)
Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn. (June 27, 2011)
Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La. (July 25, 2011)
Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg, D-N.J. (June 13, 2011)
Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah (Sept. 22, 2001)
Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind.  (June 21, 2011)
Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va. (June 20, 2011)
Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. (July 28, 2011)
Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J. (June 13, 2011)
Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore. (July 7, 2011)
Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md. (Oct. 5, 2011)
Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kan. (Sept. 7, 2011)
Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash. (July 11, 2011)
Sen. Mark Pryor, D-Ark. (June 15, 2011)
Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho (July 29, 2011)
Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan. (Sept. 22, 2011)
Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va.  (June 15, 2011)
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. (June 8, 2011)
Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y. (Oct. 3, 2011)
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H. (June 16, 2011)
Sen. Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine (June 20, 2011)
Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich. (July 7, 2011)
Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont. (June 9, 2011)
Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa. (Oct. 20, 2011)
Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo. (Oct. 3, 2011)
Sen. David Vitter, R-La. (July 27, 2011)
Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va. (Sept. 23, 2011)
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I. (June 29, 2011)
Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore. (June 8, 2011)

# # #

Reporters, Editors & Producers: Retired Maj. Gen. Gus L. Hargett Jr. is available for interviews or to appear as a subject matter expert on defense issues related to the National Guard. Contact John Goheen at (202) 789-0031 to schedule an interview or appearance.

Share

National Guard 375th Birthday Ball

  • October 12th, 2011

National Guard 375th Birthday Ball Details

Event Title:  National Guard 375th Birthday Ball
Date:   Nov 8, 2011
Time:   6:00PM – 9:30PM CT
Location:   The Gaylord National Hotel and Convention Center 201 Waterfront Street National Harbor, Maryland 20745
Description:   The National Guard traces its roots to the Massachusetts Bay Colony Charter, dated December 13, 1636, which called for the formation of a militia to muster for the common defense of the community. We plan to take the audience on a 375-year journey through militia and National Guard history with a tapestry of music, photos, video, and dance. 
 
Want to attend the 375th Birthday Ball!
Purchase your Ball Ticket(s) Today!
Please click 
HERE
Share
  • Posted in: News
  • Tags:

Contact the White House in Favor of Adding the Chief of the NGB to the JCS

  • October 12th, 2011

The Issue: Sign online petition to the White House in support of making the Chief of the National Guard Bureau a full member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

In order to better provide the National Guard the ability to influence its own budget and provide guidance over policy decision affecting the Guard, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau must be made a full-fledged member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Placing the Chief on the JCS would reflect the size, capability, and contributions made by the 470,000 guardsmen serving our nation. This is in sharp contrast to the 242,000 active and reserve Marines currently being represented by the Commandant of the Marine Corps on the JCS.

We only need 5,000 people to sign the White House petition by October 23rd, in order for it to be reviewed and an official response released by the President. So please sign the petition today and also pass it along to your friends and family.

We urge every member of the Guard to immediately go online and sign the petition, and then share the link with your family, friends, and neighbors. We need to let the White House know that the Chief of the National Guard Bureau has earned a permanent seat on the JCS.

Please take action now! Go to http://wh.gov/gfW to sign the petition immediately!

 

 

Share

Legislative Alert

  • September 15th, 2011

The Issue: Oppose the recommendation of the Defense Business Board to eliminate the present military retirement pay benefit

Immediate Action Required:  Contact your Senators and Representative to urge them to aggressively oppose any recommendation by the Defense Business Board to eliminate military retirement pay

On July 21, 2011 the Defense Business Board (DBB) Task Group published its recommendation to eliminate the current military retirement pay benefit as the way forward in “optimizing the Department’s military retirement system” which it criticized as being “more generous and expensive compared to the private sector.”

In lieu of the current military retirement pay benefit for both active and reserve military members, the DBB Task Group is recommending a mandatory Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) program that would vest after 3 to 5 years, and be payable at age 60 to 65. The Task Group touts its TSP recommendation as one that “will enable the system to be fiscally sustainable and recruit and retain the highest personnel required for our nation’s defense” by allowing military retirement funds held in a TSP to be “invested in higher yielding equities and bonds.”

The DBB Task Group was drawn exclusively from corporate executives from a variety of defense contracting, banking, mortgage servicing, corporate outsourcing, commodity futures exchange, and venture capitalist communities. Only two members of the Task Group served in the military, and that was for short active duty tour in the late 1970’s. The methodology of the Task Force was to interview upper echelon leadership in the Pentagon and retired flag officers, and did not include a broad cross section of those serving members of the military, their families or any military or veteran support organizations.

Recommendations regarding recruitment and retention were based on corporate budget cutting principals from the private sector that knows little about military service, and is dangerously out-of-touch with the realities of those who serve. If these recommendations were to be endorsed by Defense Secretary Panetta and subsequently enacted into law by Congress, the effect on military recruitment and retention would be devastating.

Equating retirement compensation of military service with that of civilian employment may look fair to a corporate executive, but not to those who have served in uniform. As an example, under this system, when a military member retires after 20 years, it is assumed that person will have the experience and qualifications to obtain credible civilian employment. However, while many of the specialties gained in the military, such as being a pilot, maintenance, information technology, intelligence and others may translate to comparable civilian jobs, many do not. The result, a significant number of military members who served our country for 20 years and then retire without an immediate annuity, would be at a significant disadvantage when it comes to finding civilian employment.

While some adjustments to military pay and benefits may be in order, we cannot let this particular effort succeed. Please contact your Senators and Representative to urge them to oppose the recommendations of the DBB Task Group as being totally out-of-touch with the employment realities members of the military will face following retirement.

TAKE THE FOLLOWING ACTION: 

By using the “Write to Congress” feature on the EANGWV Web site at located to the right of this page, you can IMMEDIATELY e-mail your elected representatives.  This is the quickest and most effective method of expressing your views to Congress. Also, contact your friends and family and urge them to use Write to Congress as well. 

Share

Remembering September 11

  • September 11th, 2011

It’s been ten years since the attack on the World Trade Centers, the attack on the Pentagon and the crash of Flight 93. Ten years since the official declaration of the War on Terrorism. Ten years of deployments and redeployments to Iraq and Afghanistan… Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom and now New Dawn. Ten years of improving the world’s already undisputed most feared military force. Ten years of caring for our wounded and honoring  those who have made the ultimate sacrifice. Ten years of keeping the freedoms for us and others who had no idea of what freedom was and what it takes to get it… and keep it. Ten years of asking and wondering…when will it be over? When will they come home? Ten years of coming together to remember. Ten years… Ten years… Ten years.

For as long as it lasts, keep your spirits high. For as long as it lasts, keep the home fires burning. For as long as it lasts, keep showing your support and appreciation. For as long as it lasts, say a prayer. For as long as it lasts… they will be strong to do what it takes. For as long as it lasts… never forget… never forget… never forget…

Thanks

“Promise given… Promise Kept”

Thomas R. Hawkins
Command Sergeant Major, USA
Senior Enlisted Leader
U.S. Transportation Command

Share
  • Posted in: News
  • Tags:

A Big Thank You to All EANGUS Members, Guests and Sponsors

  • August 30th, 2011

On behalf of the Enlisted Association of the National Guard of West Virginia, thank you! With support of all of our EANGUS members, Auxiliary, distinguished guests, the West Virginia National Guard, and all of our sponsors, the 2011 National Conference was a great success! We hope to bring this event back to Charleston in the future.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share
  • Posted in: News
  • Tags:

“Doughboy” Film Pays Tribute to Veterans, West Virginia

  • August 13th, 2011

Tory Hedderman is your typical, self-centered 16 year old. His motto: If it doesn’t have to do with him, why should he care? However, when Tory is caught vandalizing a statue of a WW I vet, he is ordered to perform community service at a local veteran’s home where he meets individuals who challenge his views on the world. “Doughboy” is an uplifting family drama that features footage of real-life vets sharing thoughts on patriotism, freedom and the attitudes of our young people today.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share
  • Posted in: News
  • Tags: